Gilkes Laskey

Post Reply
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Gilkes Laskey

Post by dukesboneman »

Has anyone tried this piece yet? Looks to be a little shallower than the Shires by the specs
Last edited by dukesboneman on Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Fidbone
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 1:14 am
Location: UK

Re: Gilles Laskey

Post by Fidbone »

Who’s Gilles?

You might get more traffic if to change that to Gilkes 😉🤣👍🏼🫣
Bleek
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Gilkes Laskey

Post by Bleek »

I’ve been playing this for about a month and previously had played the Shires/Pickett version a lot. For me it’s not a massive difference, but there are differences. Either the throat or backbore seem slightly smaller and the rim seems more rounded giving a feeling of being slightly wider to me. I think it’s just that the high point of the rim circumference feels further out than the flatter old version. Again, for me, the result is the sound is a tad clearer and more focused, a bit more life in the sound. I like it and it’s replaced the old version :)

I play it with the #3 Shires lead pipe and it's a great match. To my knowledge that's what Marshall uses, so what it was probably designed with. For lead/pop stuff the Laskey Gilkes doesn't work for me though, I'll go to a different setup.
www.bengurton.com

Shires Marshall Gilkes
Shires TW25LW/TW47 Trubore 7YLW
Shires Q36YR
XO 1632
hiktro
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:25 am

Re: Gilkes Laskey

Post by hiktro »

It may be difficult to see in this photo, but the inside of the cup is gouged to increase the space.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply

Return to “Mouthpieces”