Gilkes Laskey
- dukesboneman
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
- Location: Sarasota, Florida
- Contact:
Gilkes Laskey
Has anyone tried this piece yet? Looks to be a little shallower than the Shires by the specs
Last edited by dukesboneman on Mon Nov 11, 2024 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 1:14 am
- Location: UK
Re: Gilles Laskey
Who’s Gilles?
You might get more traffic if to change that to Gilkes
You might get more traffic if to change that to Gilkes
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: Gilkes Laskey
I’ve been playing this for about a month and previously had played the Shires/Pickett version a lot. For me it’s not a massive difference, but there are differences. Either the throat or backbore seem slightly smaller and the rim seems more rounded giving a feeling of being slightly wider to me. I think it’s just that the high point of the rim circumference feels further out than the flatter old version. Again, for me, the result is the sound is a tad clearer and more focused, a bit more life in the sound. I like it and it’s replaced the old version
I play it with the #3 Shires lead pipe and it's a great match. To my knowledge that's what Marshall uses, so what it was probably designed with. For lead/pop stuff the Laskey Gilkes doesn't work for me though, I'll go to a different setup.
I play it with the #3 Shires lead pipe and it's a great match. To my knowledge that's what Marshall uses, so what it was probably designed with. For lead/pop stuff the Laskey Gilkes doesn't work for me though, I'll go to a different setup.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:25 am
Re: Gilkes Laskey
It may be difficult to see in this photo, but the inside of the cup is gouged to increase the space.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.