Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post Reply
TomInME
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:44 pm

Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by TomInME »

Does anyone have any experience comparing the two?
I found some notes from a Shires rep in the archive stating that the "long" version (Bach length) tends "to feel a little more locked in to the harmonic series" while the standard length slides "move a little easier through the harmonic series".
My questions:
Is this more of a flexibility thing, or a width-of-slot thing?
Is it similar to the difference between the standard leadpipes and the "S" leadpipes?
Is it barely noticeable, or fairly pronounced?
GabrielRice
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:20 am
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by GabrielRice »

It's more subtle (for me at least) than the differences between leadpipes of different lengths.
TomInME
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:44 pm

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by TomInME »

GabrielRice wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:15 am It's more subtle (for me at least) than the differences between leadpipes of different lengths.
Thanks! That's probably the most important part.
Johnstad
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 10:27 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by Johnstad »

What I appreciate about the “Bach Length” slides is the ability to play low C with the F valve. The standard shires slides did not facilitate this for me.
GabrielRice
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:20 am
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by GabrielRice »

Johnstad wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:27 pm What I appreciate about the “Bach Length” slides is the ability to play low C with the F valve. The standard shires slides did not facilitate this for me.
I don't really have a usable 7th position with a Shires - or Edwards or Yamaha - standard length slide.
Dennis
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 6:23 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by Dennis »

GabrielRice wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2024 7:22 am I don't really have a usable 7th position with a Shires - or Edwards or Yamaha - standard length slide.
It's a lot like 7th position on most altos for me...right on the edge of falling off the slide on both of my Shires horns. And forget about C2 on the F-valve alone, unless I pull the tuning slide several inches.
TomInME
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:44 pm

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by TomInME »

I never really noticed that, but I checked just now and it's true for me also, even with the "Bach length" Shires slide I currently own - low E is a little bit sharp unless I take some chances. But I never use 7th unless it's the end of a fast chromatic line or part of a gliss. (I'm probably lipping it subconsciously in those cases).

For me, the low C is significantly sharp when F is in a good place, but the only real need I've ever had for that extended 7th position on the valve is Hary Janos, and I think the G may be easier to bully than the low C.
User avatar
paysonmcc
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue May 21, 2019 4:40 pm
Location: ATX

Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard

Post by paysonmcc »

I like longer slides as well. Thein has an interesting way they made their slides longer- longer legs of the slide crook. I’m not sure why they didn’t just use longer slides tubes, but this could be a nice fix for shorter horns like Edwards/ Getzen basses. Newer Edwards V models have longer Bach length slides. Here’s a photo comparing the crooks:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”