Page 1 of 1
Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:06 am
by TomInME
Does anyone have any experience comparing the two?
I found some notes from a Shires rep in the archive stating that the "long" version (Bach length) tends "to feel a little more locked in to the harmonic series" while the standard length slides "move a little easier through the harmonic series".
My questions:
Is this more of a flexibility thing, or a width-of-slot thing?
Is it similar to the difference between the standard leadpipes and the "S" leadpipes?
Is it barely noticeable, or fairly pronounced?
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:15 am
by GabrielRice
It's more subtle (for me at least) than the differences between leadpipes of different lengths.
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:21 am
by TomInME
GabrielRice wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:15 am
It's more subtle (for me at least) than the differences between leadpipes of different lengths.
Thanks! That's probably the most important part.
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:27 pm
by Johnstad
What I appreciate about the “Bach Length” slides is the ability to play low C with the F valve. The standard shires slides did not facilitate this for me.
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 7:22 am
by GabrielRice
Johnstad wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:27 pm
What I appreciate about the “Bach Length” slides is the ability to play low C with the F valve. The standard shires slides did not facilitate this for me.
I don't really have a usable 7th position with a Shires - or Edwards or Yamaha - standard length slide.
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 2:46 pm
by Dennis
GabrielRice wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 7:22 am
I don't really have a usable 7th position with a Shires - or Edwards or Yamaha - standard length slide.
It's a lot like 7th position on most altos for me...right on the edge of falling off the slide on both of my Shires horns. And forget about C2 on the F-valve alone, unless I pull the tuning slide several inches.
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 3:06 pm
by TomInME
I never really noticed that, but I checked just now and it's true for me also, even with the "Bach length" Shires slide I currently own - low E is a little bit sharp unless I take some chances. But I never use 7th unless it's the end of a fast chromatic line or part of a gliss. (I'm probably lipping it subconsciously in those cases).
For me, the low C is significantly sharp when F is in a good place, but the only real need I've ever had for that extended 7th position on the valve is Hary Janos, and I think the G may be easier to bully than the low C.
Re: Shires bass slides - "long" vs standard
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2024 9:59 pm
by paysonmcc
I like longer slides as well. Thein has an interesting way they made their slides longer- longer legs of the slide crook. I’m not sure why they didn’t just use longer slides tubes, but this could be a nice fix for shorter horns like Edwards/ Getzen basses. Newer Edwards V models have longer Bach length slides. Here’s a photo comparing the crooks: